An Equitable Phase Out of Fossil Fuel Extraction
Towards a reference framework for a fast and fair rapid global phase out of coal, oil and gas
Erratum: A previous version of the report had some minor errors in the support figures, both in terms of the total amount of support needed as well as the fair share percentages for several of the individual support providers. This has been corrected throughout the text and in tables ES-1, 1, and 2, as well as figures ES-1, ES-2, ES-3, 2, 3, and 4 (percentages only). The main findings and conclusions of the report, as well as the phaseout dates for each country and fuel remain unchanged. These errors were corrected in the pdfs on May 13, 2024. If you downloaded the report prior to this date, please re-download the corrected version above.
Key findings
“To have a decent chance of holding to the 1.5 °C limit, fossil fuel extraction must begin to decline immediately, phase down rapidly in the coming decades, and cease worldwide by 2050.”
“There is no room for new oil and gas fields or coal mines to be opened anywhere in the world” and “All investment in the further build-out of fossil-fuel infrastructure must stop immediately.”
“All countries must phase out fossil fuel extraction as quickly as possible. This will be politically achievable only if it is widely accepted as fair.”
To leave enough carbon budget for more fossil fuel-dependent economies to transition, wealthy nations that are less dependent on fossil fuel extraction such as “the United States, Norway, Australia, and the UK, must end fossil fuel extraction by the very early 2030s.”
“Countries that are highly dependent on extraction will need time to disentangle their societies from fossil fuels and build new economies. This will be extremely difficult in poorer countries such as Iraq and South Sudan, where fossil fuels account for the vast majority of economic activity.”
“Wealthy countries must provide significant amounts of climate finance and international phase-out support to the transition in poorer, dependent countries. Our initial analysis – which defines a very conservative lower bound – finds that support on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars per year will be needed. “
This “must be provided by the countries with the highest capacity and the highest responsibility for historic emissions. These include both countries that extract large amounts of fossil fuels (US, Canada etc.) and those that do not (France, Japan etc.)”
December 5th, 2023 - Dubai – As the UN Climate Talks take place in Dubai, expectations are growing for governments to include a strong mention of a managed phase-out of coal and oil and gas – the substances that are most responsible for climate breakdown – in the formal COP28 outcome. A new report proposes science- and equity-based dates by which different countries should end coal, oil and gas extraction to limit warming to 1.5°C, and argues that substantial amounts of international support are needed to make this possible in poorer countries.
The “Equitable Phaseout of Fossil Fuel Extraction: Towards a reference framework for a fair and rapid global phaseout” report, produced by the Civil Society Equity Review, proposes a framework for phasing out fossil fuel extraction – and for doing so in an equitable fashion. The Civil Society Equity Review was convened in 2015 and since then over 500 groups, organizations and movements have endorsed its analyses, findings and recommendations.
To limit warming to 1.5°C and support a globally equitable transition away from fossil fuels, the report argues that no countries can build any new fossil fuel extraction infrastructure, and that wealthy fossil fuel producers whose economies are less dependent on fossil fuel extraction, such as the USA, UK, Australia, Germany and Canada, must phase out all fossil fuel extraction by 2031 at the latest, while also providing significant financial support to poorer countries that are more dependent on fossil fuel revenues and employment.
The research shows that the least dependent fossil producers must phase out extraction by the early 2030s, while poorer countries highly dependent on fossil-fuel related revenue and jobs can take until 2050. In all cases, these phase out deadlines come much sooner than governments are currently planning for. However, this is the only way CO2 emissions can be kept within the nearly depleted 1.5°C budget. The stringency results not from equity constraints, but from the extremely limited remaining carbon budget consistent with the 1.5°C goal.
Many countries will only be able to phase out extraction as rapidly as needed if they receive international support
In this framework, the required financial support is provided by wealthy countries, defined as countries with more financial “capacity” per capita than the global average. Some support-providing counties extract large amounts of fossil fuels (US, Canada etc.) and some do not (France, Japan etc).
The amount of support that each of these countries provides is based on long- and well-accepted principles – capacity and responsibility.
Our initial analysis, based on existing studies, defines a conservative lower bound of finance needed for transition and countries shares of providing this support are as follows:
The reports begins to map detailed timelines for the phase out of fossil fuels, including which states will need significant international support to transition
Media Contacts
Michael Poland (in UAE)
michael@fossilfueltreaty.org | +61 419 581 748
Nathalia Clark (in UAE)
nathalia@fossilfueltreaty.org | +55 61 99137 1229